Kallman is shutting down New Century Brewing for good this month, and preparing for the next challenge. The decision follows a move last fall by the FDA that essentially banned New Century’s Moonshot beer because it contained caffeine.

Kallman, who ran New Century out of her Cohasset home, puts most of the blame for New Century’s demise on the FDA. The decision to label the caffeine in the beer as a dangerous substance took the fizz out of her expansion plans. She says it didn’t make sense to reformulate Moonshot one more time, especially without its signature ingredient. Her other product – Edison Light – had a following, but it wasn’t doing well enough to sustain New Century on its own.

You can read the whole story here:

FDA’s move is last call for local beer company.

We wish Rhonda the best of luck as she pursues new adventures.

Unfortunately, Moonshot’s future has been cut short by the FDA who lumped it together with Four Loko and others and forced it off the market.

Rhonda has put out an appeal to get Americans to “lobby” for her right to sell Moonshot. Whether Moonshot appeals to you or not, the bigger question is whether Moonshot was caught up in the wrong net.

Here is the appeal in Rhonda’s own words:

If you want to read more, here are recent articles from the Boston Globe and the Washington Examiner.

It was a magical experience that we will never forget. It was a full-scale theatrical production (on the same stage as Yo-Yo Ma, Los Lobos an Arlo Guthrie perform) with tons of high tech electronics including 5 HD cameras and satellite trucks. For me, it was the culmination of a 3-year journey to make a feature film depicting not only the U.S. beer industry but also the American entrepreneurial spirit.

The journey to get the film seen has been fraught with challenges. They say that “it’s all in the timing” and for independent films, these are the worst of times. Not only is there a glut of finished films (including some with big name stars) sitting on the shelf but also the traditional distribution model has all but disappeared. And the media world has been transformed due to the influence of bloggers and social media. What this means is that the fight to get noticed for an indie film goes beyond distribution (and Beer Wars is a success story in that realm) to finding new ways to reach an audience. Fewer film critics, fewer newspapers and magazines mean less opportunity for mainstream reviews. Shrinking ad sales mean there’s no chance that a network would risk offending a major advertiser. You get the point.

So yes, it’s been a rough ride. But for all the downs, there have been many ups. I’ve met some amazing people on this roller coaster ride. And I’m grateful for the kindness of complete strangers I’ve met at screenings, bars, and festivals and through Twitter and Facebook. I wanted to start a conversation. I wanted to get people to think about the choices they make. And I love hearing that indeed the film appears to have made a difference. Small perhaps (because most Americans have no awareness of the film) but it’s a start.

I’m hoping that the conversation will continue and that it will involve brewers, distributors, retailers and regulators who will strive to create a more level playing field for beer consumers.

So I raise a (virtual) beer to everyone who has joined me on this amazing journey.

Thank you!

Let me start by admitting that the film is not perfect. Most documentaries are flawed. When you start out without a script and are creating a narrative structure, things aren’t as seamless as in a film that has an inherent beginning, middle and end. I chose to make a mainstream film about a topic I’m passionate about. And like the independent brewers in the film, I’m an entrepreneur. The challenge of making a feature film that’s both entertaining and enlightening while providing an emotional connection for the audience is no easy task. I can’t apologize if the film wasn’t what you were expecting. Like a brewer, I realized my vision with the ingredients I had at hand. And it didn’t help that it was nearly impossible to get the brewers to speak honestly about the obstacles they face with the camera rolling. I understand why but it made my job as the director much tougher.

Let’s get to it. The top 5 recurring issues brought up by bloggers’ critiques of the film (some made by people who have not even seen it) are:

1. The filmmaker doesn’t drink craft beer (or beer at all) and doesn’t know anything because mike’s hard lemonade is not a beer. The filmmaker’s presence irritated me.
2. Rhonda (or the Moonshot lady) should have been cut out of the film. She is not a craft brewer and her beer is shit.
3. There should have been more breweries represented from [insert region here].
4. The film is dated. Everything is good now. Craft beer is growing so the distribution issues are moot.
5. It is preaching to the choir.

Let’s address these from my perspective.

1. I never hid the fact that I’m allergic to alcohol nor my background. So yes, I can’t drink and I’m not a member of the craft beer club (maybe that’s a positive since I’m objective about the beers themselves). And let’s not debate mike’s any longer. It is sold in the beer cooler and distributed by beer wholesalers. So I may not be an expert on how beer tastes but I do have the experience of running an entrepreneurial company in the beer industry. You may not like mike’s or what it stands for but that doesn’t diminish my understanding of the way the industry operates.

   I’m not sure how to address what some have portrayed as my “irritating presence.” I made a choice to tell the story from my point of view. The feedback from screenings was always that the film needed a narrator to tie it together and that my character worked fine.

2. On to Rhonda. I didn’t pick her because she’s a woman. Or because Moonshot is a “marketing gimmick” like mike’s. Or because she’s a craft brewer. Because she clearly is not. I chose Rhonda because she had a compelling story that was different than Sam’s. Following 2 craft brewers while interesting to the beer geeks would have made for 2 parallel stories at a time when craft beer’s trajectory is rising. Frankly — not that interesting. Especially in a feature film. Hopefully one of the myriad of TV series pilots about craft beer will make it to the airwaves and that’s where you’ll satiate that appetite.And I always knew that I’d get this reaction from the beer community. But in test screenings with umpteen mainstream audiences, her story is the one that got them feeling something. Some loved Rhonda and some hated her. But that is the test of a great character in a film – the ability to evoke emotion from an audience. And yes, I tried taking her out but without her, there was no movie. If Sam is the soul of Beer Wars, Rhonda is its heart. And if you pull yourself out of what you know and look at her as a character in a movie, I think you’ll agree that her story is powerful. She had it all. The Queen of beer. Chose to start over again. On her own this time. And despite the obstacles, she kept on going. You have to wonder why she chose to compete with mainstream beers when she could have jumped on the craft bandwagon. What drives this woman? Will she make it? Try to look at her story objectively (like others have) and maybe you’ll see that she has just as much in common with other independent brewers trying to realize their dreams. Maybe the reason that Moonshot doesn’t succeed is that it’s running counter to what consumers want. As to taste, I can’t comment but I never saw anyone spit it out. It may not be for you, but does that mean that anyone who doesn’t make a craft beer should fail? Isn’t the point that we should let consumers decide? And to do so, give them the choice?
3. I had 90 minutes to tell a story. There is no way to show even a fraction of all the amazing breweries in America. I had to make choices early on. I selected some of the better known breweries to highlight (Yuengling, Boston Beer, New Belgium and Stone) and Dogfish Head which in 2005 was still tiny and was just starting to get some heat. Sure, there are many others. I even filmed at breweries like Schlafly in St. Louis but ultimately everything had to fit into the bigger story. And so, yes, I made creative choices and I stand by them. The breweries I excluded (over 1400) were absent from the film because their story was either similar to others already represented or because they simply did not fit into the narrative structure. Again, hopefully a cable network will buy a TV show that showcases all these fabulous breweries. It was just impossible to introduce any more complexity into the structure of this film.
4. I’m really not sure how to address this. Ironically, this comment was out there before the film was even screened. Rather than repeating myself, I’d like to direct you to a comment Greg Koch made in response to a blog post about this very issue .And speaking of Greg, I must say something here about his integrity. Here’s a guy who knew that the film wasn’t specifically about him and yet he not only agreed to sit on the panel (even though he wasn’t the “Star”) but he graciously supported the film by encouraging people to see it. And all this before he ever saw one single frame. If I make a sequel, I’m making it about Greg.
5. I made the film to appeal to the widest possible audience. That’s why I chose to create (and pay for) a one night event to be simulcast to 440 theaters. I thought that being in mainstream theaters would bring out a wider audience. It’s why I got into business with Fathom Events and not independent art house theaters. I still don’t know how many people actually attended the event so let’s hold off on this discussion until I have all the facts. Suffice to say that I am sorry that many of you never got to see the film and/or panel because of technical issues at your theater. I’m trying to do my bit by giving you first dibs on the DVD at a reduced price.

Todd Alstrom was right when he said that the Internet makes everyone a critic. And while I welcome the strong opinions on the film, I really hope we can move on to discussing what really matters. As to film reviews, they were provided by the Los Angeles Times and CNN, with more to follow. And these mainstream media players seemed to get the film and the message.

So please, let’s continue the discussion but make it about consumer choice. The question before us is, do we accept the status quo of being at 5% or is there room to grow from there and reach more beer drinkers? I encourage you to think about Greg’s words as they echo the reason why I made this film in the first place.

And hopefully we can spread the conversation to a wider audience once I announce additional screenings and DVDs. Isn’t that the whole idea? To bring the issues out to a mainstream audience and get them to care about their beer choice and having access to it?

So let’s talk. Openly and honestly about the future and what it can be.

Let’s start with the 2 you won’t see. I wanted the new heads of MillerCoors and Anheuser-Busch Inbev to provide their perspective. Tom Long from Miller Coors passed because he had a “conflict” while Dave’s Peacock’s “handlers” told me they’d get back to me. Tick tock.

Here’s what to expect from the panel. Sam Calagione and Rhonda Kallman will bring you up to date on their stories. And after watching the film, you’ll be glad they’re there to fill you in.

Greg Koch, Charlie Papazian, Maureen Ogle and Todd Alstrom will provide their unique perspectives on where we’ve been and where we’re going. Having spent time with all of them while making the film, I don’t think there’s a shrinking violet in the bunch. I have a feeling that 30 minutes may not be enough to contain these personalities.

Also remember that none of them have seen the film so their reactions will be raw. And since I’ll be on the panel with them, let’s hope no shoes are hurled at me or at each other. That’s the cool thing about a LIVE show. Anything can happen.